Charts for Great Circle Sailing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We publish in this week's issue of the SUPPLEMENT an illustrated article by Prof. Richard A. Proctor, on charts for great circle sailing, which is a very interesting development of the law of least force. The chart brought forward by Prof. Proctor is a stereographic projection --one in which each point on the sphere is projected on a tangent plane by a line joining the point and the outer end of the tangential diameter; and since it gives the entire globe, except a small area within the Antarctic Circle, on one sheet, it is well adapted for plotting a great circle . course. By the method given in connection with the chart, a seaman may lay down without any difficulty the shortest track between two ports, that is, the arc of a great circle joining those ports, or the shortest distance between any point reached during the journey and any desired haven, and can calculate the distance. Ordinarily, vessels follow what is called the rhumb course, or that in which the same compass bearing, apart from magnetic variation, is maintained throughout the journey, but a great saving of distance is effected by sailing on the arc of a great circle; thus the distance from Melbourne to Cape Town is 6,154 miles on the rhumb course, but is 587 miles shorter on a great circle. It is the purpose of Prof. Proctor's article to make this more advantageous course practically attainable. The advantages of great circle sailing have been known for many years, but hitherto the difficulties of calculating and plotting the course have been so great that it never came into more than exceptional use. The gnomonic projection suggested by Mr. Hugh Godfray, for charts to be used in great circle and composite sailing, was some advance, but the area represented on one chart being of necessity limited, it was impossible to lay down a ship's course of any extent on one chart, and the process of calculation was too complicated. The chart and methods suggested by Prof. Proctor are very simple, and may be readily grasped by navigators of even small mathematical knowledge. They promise to bring great circle sailing into general use, and by the notable saving of time effected, to be a valuable contribution to the progress of an age which is prone to rank speed among its greatest attainments.

SA Supplements Vol 20 Issue 501suppThis article was published with the title “Charts for Great Circle Sailing” in SA Supplements Vol. 20 No. 501supp (), p. 80
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08081885-7991csupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe