Chasing Rainbows

Black-and-white photos turn into Technicolor

Steven Dakin’s illusory coloring of a grayscale image of eastern rosellas (original from www.animal.photos.com).

Steve Dakin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In July the Internet exploded with a photo of schoolchildren. The kids, dressed in dark shorts and colorful T-shirts, appear to be enjoying a field trip, perhaps to a zoo or a nature preserve. In the center of the image, a crouching girl in a yellow T-shirt holds a medium-sized turtle toward an adult taking a picture of the scene. Smiling classmates, dressed in matching white, green, red and blue T-shirts, gather around the girl and turtle. At first sight, nothing seems amiss in the group shot. But a closer examination reveals that the many hues in the background and the children’s clothing are not real colors. The seemingly polychromatic image is actually black-and-white, overlaid with a thin multicolored grid. 

Dubbed the “color assimilation grid illusion” by its creator, digital media artist and software developer Øyvind Kolås, the artifice is related to other visual effects evoking illusory tints, such as the Munker illusion, neon color spreading and the watercolor illusion. Such colorful deceptions occur because our brain’s visual system processes color at much lower resolution than it does shape.

Pastel and watercolor painters from Cezanne to Picasso have taken advantage of our coarse color perception to do away with coloring inside the lines. Instead artists often apply pigment to objects and people in a vague, imprecise way, without paying much mind to depicted boundaries. The visual brain, unfazed, assigns the correct colors to the relevant shapes, and observers are none the wiser. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The crisscrossing grid in the original image is not critical to the misperception. Neither is the particular image that went viral. Kolås has shown similar effects with many other grayscale pictures, by virtue of superimposing on them colored lines, polka dots and even text. The images in this column illustrate how a delicate chromatic grid, overlaid on a black-and-white photo of two eastern rosellas (Australian parakeets), restores the birds’ dazzling tones to our perception.

Blurring one’s vision makes the illusion even more striking, by further reducing the quality of the visual system’s color processing. To achieve maximum illusive pigmentation of the above photo, try squinting your eyes, removing your glasses or spying the birds out of the corner of your eye.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Stephen Macknik is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind. He is also author of Champions of Illusion, along with Susana Martinez-Conde. Follow Macknik on Twitter @stephen_macknik

More by Stephen Macknik
SA Mind Vol 30 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Chasing Rainbows” in SA Mind Vol. 30 No. 6 (), p. 66
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112019-16XVMdAAoF2YWWpK5uyaTH

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe