New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cheap Paper Diagnostics Would Save Lives in Remote, Impoverished Places

Cheap, rapid screening for diseases such as Ebola and tuberculosis could save lives in remote and impoverished places

Daniel Stolle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A patient checks into a rural African clinic with a high fever. The diagnosis could be anything from mild typhoid to Ebola. Even if laboratory blood tests are available, it will take days to get results. What is a doctor to do: Prescribe antibiotics or order a quarantine?

Researchers have been working for a decade on quick, cheap paper diagnostics (think home pregnancy tests) that could save lives in such situations. The first generation of those tests is now inching toward commercialization. The nonprofit organization Diagnostics For All is awaiting regulatory approval to deploy a blood-based liver-function test in Africa. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation–funded Intellectual Ventures in Bellevue, Wash., is working on an ultrasensitive malaria test, as well as a urine-based tuberculosis diagnostic tool. Paul Yager, a bioengineering professor at the University of Washington, is developing a sensitive test for the Ebola virus protein in blood. None of these devices costs more than a few dollars or requires special training.

At the heart of these diagnostic tools are strips of paper that are either engraved or overlaid with patterns that split, concentrate and mix fluids. Paper naturally wicks blood, urine and other fluids, so samples flow through the devices under their own power. The patterns steer the fluid through the dilutions and reactions necessary for identifying a pathogen or disease marker. For example, Diagnostics For All's liver-function test contains a filter that screens out red blood cells, allowing plasma to flow into a bottom paper layer loaded with reagents that combine with an enzyme that indicates liver damage. A color change indicates the patient's enzyme level.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first generation of paper diagnostics will generally detect disease by spotting molecules produced by the infected body or by the culprit microbes themselves, but tests that directly detect the DNA of pathogens could follow. These so-called nucleic acid tests would allow doctors to accurately identify diseases in their earliest stages. Yager, Harvard University chemistry professor George Whitesides and other researchers are independently pursuing paper-based nucleic acid testing. Yager is developing a nucleic acid–based home Zika virus test and is applying for funding for faster, cheaper tests for Zika, dengue and yellow fever.

Technical challenges remain, but researchers say the biggest barrier is financial. Pharmaceutical companies see little profit in devices that cost pennies, so most funding comes from governments and private foundations. “We and others have shown that the technology works,” Whitesides says. “A lot depends on whether we can get over the last hump of commercialization.”

Prachi Patel is a freelance journalist based in Pittsburgh. She writes about energy, materials science, nanotechnology, biotechnology and computing.

More by Prachi Patel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 6This article was published with the title “9. Paper Diagnostics That Cost Pennies” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 6 (), p. 42
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1216-40

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe