New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Chemical anti-terrorism law passed, improved by U.S. Congress

Program lists facilities holding dangerous chemicals and sets emergency plans

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Legislation to protect US chemical plants from terrorist attacks has been extended and renewed for another four years. The bipartisan measure makes a series of key changes to the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) to improve its efficiency and effectiveness. For example, it expedites the approval process for site security plans for low risk chemical facilities and also clarifies the emergency shutdown authorities.

Congressman Patrick Meehan, a Republican who chairs a Homeland Security subcommittee for infrastructure protection, called the bill ‘a major breakthrough’. He said Congress has provided ‘smart, binding’ guidelines to improve the CFATS’s operation, measure progress and enhance security. As a result, Meehan said firefighters and emergency workers will be safer when they respond to incidents like the deadly explosion in April 2013 at the West Fertilizer plant in Texas. That accident occurred after a fire erupted and caused approximately 27 tonnes of ammonium nitrate to explode.

This reauthorisation of the CFATS programme will bring certainty to chemical distributors and regulators by providing necessary funding to develop and implement DHS-approved security plans, according to Eric Byer, the president of the National Association of Chemical Distributors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on December 22, 2014.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe