Chemical Clues to Darwin's Abominable Mystery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From the peony, with its showy blooms, to the modestly endowed daisy, all flowering plants share a common ancestor. But exactly how and when this group originated has long puzzled scientists. The earliest known flowering plant fossils date to around 130 million years ago, yet transitional fossils linking them to other ancient plants are unknown. Indeed, Charles Darwin himself dubbed the sudden appearance of the flowering plants in the fossil record "an abominable mystery." Now new research, described yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Chemical Society, suggests that these flora evolved more than 120 million years prior to the appearance of their earliest known fossil representatives.

Stanford University geochemist J. Michael Moldowan and his colleagues studied a compound known as oleanane, which is produced by many flowering plants as a defense against insects and microbial invaders. It is not, however, found in other seed plants such as pines and gingkoes. The team was able to retrieve oleanane molecules from oily rock deposits dating back to the Permian period, hundreds of millions of years ago. Specifically, they found the compound in sediments containing extinct plants called gigantopterids, making these the oldest known oleanane-producing seed plants. As such, they were probably among the earliest relatives of the flowering plants, team member David Winshop Taylor of Indiana University Southeast concludes.

Taylor adds that their findings hold even more significance in light of another recent discovery¿ancient gigantopterid fossils from China exhibiting leaves and stems similar to those of modern flowering plants.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe