New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Chemical in Gardenia Fruit Raises Hopes for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Roughly one fifth of older Americans suffer from adult-onset diabetes. This form of the disease, also known as type 2 diabetes, arises when insulin-producing cells in the pancreas fail to make enough of the hormone, or cells in the body become resistant to its influence, causing blood sugar levels to rise. This surge, in turn, can lead to potentially life threatening effects. The Western medicine chest currently holds no cure for type 2 diabetes, though treatments can preserve and prolong life. But taking a cue from traditional Chinese medicine, researchers have uncovered a specific chemical from the fruit of the gardenia plant that seems to attack the root of the disease.

Researchers Bradford Lowell of Harvard Medical School, Chen-Yu Zhang of Nanjing University and their team set out to find a compound that would block the activity of an enzyme known as uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2). This protein helps a cell's mitochondria convert food molecules into energy, but also inhibits pancreas cells from secreting insulin. It appears in high concentrations in both animal and human diabetics. "We think the increase in UCP2 activity is an important component of the pathogenesis of diabetes," Lowell explains. "Our goal therefore was to discover a UCP2 inhibitor."

Zhang suggested probing the fruit of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis based on its use in Chinese medicine. Pancreas cells from mice treated with the extract released insulin whereas those from mice genetically modified to lack UCP2 showed no change, suggesting the extract worked by blocking that protein. "When I first saw the results, I was in disbelief," Lowell recalls.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Subsequent analyses isolated the responsible molecule: genipin, previously known for its ability to bind proteins. By adding it to mouse pancreatic tissue in vitro, the researchers restored the cells' sensitivity to blood glucose levels and reduced insulin levels. A version of genipin altered to remove its binding abilities showed similar--though weaker--effects. That is important for any subsequent therapies because genipin's protein-linking abilities could lead to a host of side effects, Lowell says. The research appears in the current issue of Cell Metabolism.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe