New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Chemicals in Food Containers Linked to Prostate Problems in Developing Mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fetal exposure to man-made chemicals found in oral contraceptives and some food containers can cause male mice to develop deformities in their prostate and bladder, a new study has found. The results indicate that the cellular changes could predispose the prostate to disease in adulthood.

Barry G. Timms of the University of South Dakota School of Medicine and his colleagues studied the effects of very low doses of so-called estrogenic chemicals. Specifically, they studied ethinylestradiol, which is used in oral contraceptives, and bisphenol A, an organic chemical used in the manufacture of plastics, some sealants and the resin lining many tin cans for food storage. The researchers exposed pregnant mice to environmental levels of the two chemicals for five days during the period that corresponds to the 10th week of pregnancy in humans. Male fetuses that developed under these conditions experienced problems with malformation of the bladder and developed more, and larger, ducts in the prostate.

The investigators also subjected a group of mice to high, pharmacological doses of another estrogen chemical that used to be widely prescribed to pregnant women, diethylstilbestrol (DES), and found that it had the opposite effect, inhibiting duct formation. Thus, they argue that results from studies using higher levels of exposure "are not relevant for predicting the effects of exposure to low levels of man-made estrogenic chemicals present in the environment." In addition, because problems in male children of mothers who took DES while pregnant did not become apparent until years later, the team suggests that risk guidelines for ethinylestradiol and bisphenol A should be reevaluated. The findings are published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe