Chemicals Stop Starfish from Eating Coral

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most of us think of starfish as fairly benign, peaceful ocean dwellers, but in fact the poisonous crown-of-thorns variety devours endangered coral reefs. Certainly many other factors¿among them overfishing, pollution, typhoons, snorkelers and global warming¿threaten the fragile reefs that many other sea critters call home. But the situation is dire: an estimated 27 percent of the world's coral reefs have already been destroyed, according to the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, and an estimated 40 percent will vanish by 2010 without better management. Thus, scientists have sought ways to thwart the hungry starfish from doing their part. Unfortunately, tactics such as poisoning, harpooning or isolating the animals have not been successful.

Some researchers are attempting to develop means for controlling starfish populations by way of introducing disease and predators. But in the meantime, Daisuke Uemura and his colleagues at Nagoya University in Japan have come up with a kinder approach: they have identified two active chemicals in sea urchins that appear to lure the five-armed menaces away from their coral feasts. The chemists described the attractants¿arachidonic acid and a-linolenic acid¿yesterday at the 2000 International Chemical Congress of Pacific Basin Societies. Both unsaturated fatty acids drew only a small number of starfish in an initial trial, but Uemura feels the results are promising because they represent proof of principle. "Although we can't save all the coral reefs in the world from destruction," he says, "our research is useful for saving some of them."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe