"Chemo Brain" Culprit

Lifesaving cancer treatment may cost patients their neurons

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Those who have endured the rigors of cancer therapy talk about “chemo brain,” the memory and concentration problems that accompany radiation and chemotherapy. Now researchers led by neurologist Michelle L. Monje of Harvard University have found the root of these cognitive difficulties: damaged stem cells.

In the hippocampus, a brain region vital for laying down new memories, “stem cells continue to add new circuit elements,” says Stanford University neuroscientist Theo D. Palmer, who helped Monje find out why brain fogginess can persist for years after cancer treatment has ended. They discovered that the chemicals and radiation used to kill tumor cells damage the stem cell reservoir in the hippocampus and nearly halt the formation of new neurons in both children and adults.

Radiation treatment also triggers a response from microglial cells, the immune cells of the central nervous system. Because the inflammatory cells stifle neuronal growth, some experts think that the microglia may be the real culprit behind radiation-induced brain defects. The researchers’ previous work in rats showed that anti-inflammatory drugs helped to restore some neurogenesis.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Without such intervention, stem cells damaged by radiation do not seem to recover, according to Monje. But there is hope: exercise has been shown to stimulate neurogenesis in healthy animals and in people, so Monje thinks there is a good chance that being active would help improve cognition in cancer sur­vivors, too.

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 1This article was published with the title “'Chemo Brain' Culprit” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0208-14a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe