On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In the February issue of Scientific American biologist Carolynn “K-lynn” L. Smith of Macquarie University in Sydney and science writer Sarah Zielinski describe the surprisingly advanced cognitive abilities of the chicken. A number of recent insights into the chicken mind have come from experiments involving the use of video displays. Knowing that chickens will watch one another on screen led Smith and her collaborators to create a 3-D animated chicken, which they then used to probe how the birds display for and perceive one another. The virtual chicken also helped them figure out why roosters have wattles.
The beauty of the virtual chicken is that the researchers could test the female’s reaction to a rooster with a wattle and without one, and watch her responses to wattles of varying size and flexibility—all by altering the appendage digitally.
It turns out that the wattle serves as a sort of red flag for the hens, helping them spot a male who has food. Males signal that they have food in order to lure mates, and they do this by twitching and bobbing their heads—movements that set the wattle aflutter.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
