New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Children of Smart Fathers Have Higher Risk of Autism

Kids of men with IQs of 111 or higher were one third more likely to develop the disorder, but the increased risk was "very slight”

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Children whose fathers are highly intelligent are at a 31 percent higher risk of autism than those whose fathers are of average intelligence, according to unpublished results presented today at the 2017 International Meeting for Autism Research in San Francisco, California.

The work supports observations that date back to the 1940s, when Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger noted in separate reports that the fathers of children with autism tended to be highly intelligent and in several cases worked in technical fields. A 2012 study also showed that children from regions in the Netherlands where high-tech jobs are prevalent are more likely to have autism than those who live in other regions.

In the new study, lead investigator Renee Gardner, assistant professor at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, set out to investigate whether the historical lore has validity. She and her colleagues matched medical records for 309,803 children whose fathers were conscripted into the Swedish military with their father’s scores on the technical portion of the Swedish intelligence quotient (IQ) test.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They found a one-third higher risk of autism in children whose fathers’ IQ scores are 111 or higher than in those whose fathers’ scores cluster around 100. The researchers controlled for possible confounding factors such as families’ socioeconomic status and parental age, education level and history of inpatient psychiatric treatment.

IQ indicators:

They found the opposite relationship between a father’s IQ and his child’s chances of having intellectual disability or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In particular, children of men with an IQ of 75 or below had a four-and-a-half times higher risk of intellectual disability. The chance of ADHD was 65 percent higher than average for children whose fathers had an IQ in that low range.

Gardner is careful not to overstate the magnitude of the risk associated with having a smart father. “Seeing this association with a high paternal technical IQ is interesting,” she said. But she called the increased risk “very slight” and said that an apparent risk factor doesn’t explain why a person has autism.

What’s more, the work is missing the second half of the genetic puzzle: intelligence data from the children’s mothers, says Kelly Bakulski, research assistant professor at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, who was not involved in the study. That information unfortunately wasn’t available, as the Swedish military doesn’t require women to sign up, Gardner says.

Even so, she says, “it’s intriguing that this original observation actually holds up in our very modern-day data.”

For more reports from the 2017 International Meeting for Autism Research, please click here.

Further Reading

Brain’s immune cells may explain sex bias in autism

Common variants, rare mutations combine to shape autism risk

Sex and other foreign words

Adults with disabilities deserve right to choose where to live

This story was originally published on Spectrum.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe