Children's Intuitions on Mind-Body Dualism Emerge Early

Minds are less replicable than physical traits, according to young kids

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Does the brain create the mind? Many neuroscientists would say yes, but most of us—suggests University of Bristol neuroscientist Bruce Hood—carry a conviction that the mind is a special entity, distinct from our physical body. In other words, if it were possible to make an exact copy of someone's body, including the brain, most people's gut feeling is that the duplicate's consciousness would differ in some way from the original. Hood, with colleagues at Bristol and at Yale University, decided to investigate this question with young children to see whether we hold views on this subject early in life.

The researchers introduced five- and six-year-old kids to a hamster. The hamster had special physical traits—a broken tooth, for example—and each child interacted with the hamster to create a few memories. Then the investigators placed the animal in an elaborate box they call the duplicator and revealed a second, seemingly identical hamster. The children were asked a series of questions to reveal the degree to which they believed this new hamster was like the original.

Most children believed that physical traits, such as the broken tooth, were the same in both hamsters. About half of them, however, believed that the hamsters would not share memories. The findings, reported in the journal Cognition last December, suggest that we may develop our beliefs about the uniqueness of identity and mind at a very young age. The distinction between mental and physical replication was even greater when the original hamster was introduced with a name, “Dax.” In this case, about 70 percent of the children doubted that mental traits had duplicated along with physical ones. What's in the name? Hood suspects that naming primes kids to see the hamster as more human and unique.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe