New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Chimpanzee Nut-Bashing Technology Proves Thousands of Years Old

Chimpanzees have been using hammer stones and anvils for at least 4,300 years, according to new archaeological evidence from Africa

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The chimpanzees of Ivory Coast's Ta¿ National Park in western Africa are quite handy with a hammer stone. They use the large stones to expertly smash panda nuts and other food sources, chipping and flaking them in the process—a feat humans would be hard-pressed to mimic. After all, the stones are much larger than can easily be grasped by a human hand and require much more strength than the human arm can generate. Now archaeologist Julio Mercader of the University of Calgary and his team have found worn hammers and stone fragments over 4,000 years old that apparently were used by chimps.

The researchers uncovered 206 stone pieces from sites in Ivory Coast that resembled the tools and detritus produced by modern chimp nut-bashing. Dating the surrounding muck via its carbon 14 content revealed that the stones were laid down 4,300 years ago. To make sure that the stones were not formed by natural processes—so-called geofacts—the rocks were mixed in with such naturally formed artifacts and submitted to a blind test by outside experts, which confirmed the damage was not made by nature.

The researchers then determined that the stones must have been chimp tools because of their size: a typical human hammer stone is no longer than 120 millimeters (less than 5 inches) and weighs less than 400 grams (less than one pound). Even the anvils rarely weigh more than 1,000 grams (more than 2 pounds). Yet, these stones averaged roughly 320 millimeters in length (12.6 inches) and 2,030 grams (4.5 pounds) in weight. "They are bigger stones, heavier stones," Mercader says. "You need a bigger hand and a bigger arm to use them." Plus, the researchers tested the stones for food residue, including the five nuts chimps are known to crack and eat as well as 24 varieties of nuts and other starches that humans exploit in the region. "Not only did we find the starch that chimps eat," he adds, "but we also do not find evidence of the ones that humans prefer."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The antiquity of the stones means that chimpanzees have been cracking nuts since long before human farmers reached the region—one explanation for the ability of modern chimps to use hammer stones and anvils to open food. This is no easy feat; modern chimps undergo a seven-year apprenticeship to master the technique. But it turns out this training may be age-old. Mercader, for one, believes that the use of such stone tools may be a technology traceable to a shared ancestor of chimps and humans. "I'd like to see if there is any evidence of stone pieces that could resemble these kinds of technologies at early hominid sites," he says. "But in order to find those, you have to be open to the possibility."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe