Quake Lakes Swell as Aftershocks Continue in China

Soldiers and rescue workers race to evacuate villages in the path of a possible flood if quake-formed lakes cannot hold their water

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Strong tectonic jolts continue to torment southwest China in the wake of its deadly May 12 earthquake, injuring dozens and leveling some 420,000 houses. These tremors—some as powerful as magnitude 6.4—persist as 600 emergency workers and soldiers Tuesday desperately tried to evacuate 80,000 residents and drain swelling lakes to keep them from flooding already devastated areas. More will have to be evacuated if the drainage plan fails. The official death toll from the quake and aftershocks now stands at more than 67,000.

If the 4.6-billion-cubic-foot (130-million-cubic-meter) Tangjiashan lake, formed when post-quake landslides choked a portion of the Jianjiang River, crests over its mud banks, workers will have to evacuate as many as 1.3 million people, according to China's Xinhua News Agency. Workers are digging an artificial channel through the mud and debris to divert some of the lake's water from local communities damaged during the earthquake. The news agency says that crews hope to finish the channel by June 5. Tangjiashan, the largest of 35 backed-up lakes formed after the initial earthquake registering 7.9 on the Richter scale, is inaccessible by road and can only be reached by foot or air.

A magnitude 5.4 aftershock hit Qingchuan County in Sichuan Province at about 4:03 P.M. local time Tuesday, injuring 63 people. And a tremor at magnitude 5.7 hit neighboring Ningqiang County in Shaanxi Province a short time later at 4:35 P.M. local time, according to the China National Seismological Network. Qingchuan was also the epicenter of a magnitude 6.4 jolt on May 25, the strongest aftershock since the original earthquake struck Sichuan's Wenchuan County on May 12. Officials have confirmed at least eight dead and hundreds of others injured in that aftershock.

Although the Richter scale has no upper limit, the most devastating earthquakes have magnitudes of 8.0 or higher. More moderate quakes register at 4.5 or greater in magnitude, whereas those of 2.0 or less are typically referred to as "microearthquakes," according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). American seismologist Charles Richter (1891 to 1989) developed the eponymous scale in 1935 to quantify earthquake magnitude, or strength.

Earthquakes are triggered by the release of energy stored in rocks clustered around a fault, which separates masses of Earth's crust known as tectonic plates. These rocks are held in place by friction and, as time goes by, the movement of the plates causes the rocks around the fault to bend and stretch. This causes the rocks to behave like compressed springs, storing energy until the friction across the fault is not able to hold the rocks back, thereby forming a crack across the fault as it begins to slip. This releases part of the built-up energy, some of which creates the seismic waves that travel to the surface and cause damage. Earthquakes stop when there is not enough energy to maintain them. The energy released by the sliding fault needs to be substantial enough to break the friction holding rocks in place.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe