China Unveils Green Targets

Premier vows to improve energy efficiency and curb pollution and carbon emissions.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Jane Qiu

Growing environmental costs and energy demands have persuaded China's leaders that the country cannot sustain its breakneck economic growth. In a speech on Saturday at the annual National Party Congress in Beijing, Premier Wen Jiabao announced ambitious five-year goals for increasing energy efficiency and curbing carbon emissions -- and a reduced target for economic growth.

In the past five years, China's gross domestic product (GDP) has increased at an average rate of 11.2% a year. The country has reduced its energy intensity -- or energy consumption per unit of GDP -- by 19.1%, just short of a 20% target set five years ago. Emissions of chemical oxygen demand (a measure of organic pollutants in water) and sulfur dioxide per unit of GDP also dipped by 12.5% and 14.3% respectively, exceeding previous targets of 10%.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The latest five-year plan has lowered the economic-growth target to around 7% a year, and calls for energy intensity to decline by a further 16%. The plan is China's first to include targets for carbon emissions per unit of GDP -- to be reduced by 17% -- and total energy use, which will be capped at 4 billion tons of coal equivalent by 2015, compared with the 3.25 billion tons consumed last year (see 'Goals for 2015').

"The targets are very ambitious in global terms," says Antony Froggatt, a climate and environment policy expert at Chatham House, a think tank in London that focuses on international affairs. But because the country's imports of coal, oil and gas are increasing each year, he says, the goals "are crucial for China to become competitive on the global market".

The plans are in line with China's existing aim to reduce carbon intensity by 40-45% from 2005 levels by 2020 (see Nature 462, 550-551; 2009). Froggatt notes, however, that the commitments fall short of what some climate-policy experts regard as a sufficient contribution towards the current international goal of preventing the world's temperature from increasing by 2 °C over the pre-industrial level. "But China is not alone in that," he adds.

To meet its targets, China will scrutinize its entire energy-production chain, from suppliers to transmission and end users, and will inspect industries sector by sector, looking for ways to increase efficiency. The country also aims to raise the proportion of its energy coming from non-fossil fuels -- notably, wind energy, hydropower and nuclear power -- to 11.4% by 2015. The government hopes that plans to increase spending on research and development to 2.2% of GDP -- significantly higher than today -- will yield breakthroughs in clean energy.

Critics applaud China's plan to cut energy and carbon intensities, but say that the question is not just whether the targets will be enforced, but how. "Low-carbon economy is not just about number crunching," says Zou Ji, an environmental economist at Renmin University in Beijing. "There are different ways to meet the targets, and some are more cost-effective and sustainable than others."

Many say that China met the previous energy-intensity target largely through draconian government measures, such as strict quotas imposed on local governments and energy-intensive industries. Fear of missing their targets led some provinces to severely ration power in the latter half of last year. This "is not necessarily the most cost-effective approach", says Kelly Gallagher, who studies energy and environment policy at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts.

The transition to a low-carbon economy requires not only technological innovation, but also drastic reforms in energy pricing, along with mechanisms such as emissions trading and carbon taxation, says Zou. "These are on the agenda of the central government, in principle," he says. "Whether they can be implemented in the next few years will determine the future of China's economic competitiveness."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe