New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

River ‘piracy’ is draining one of China’s biggest waterways

For the last 1.7 million years, China’s Yangtze River has been stealing water from the Yellow River, new research shows

A windy river over a scenic landscape.

The Yellow River in the Chinese province of Sichuan.

YINYI WANG/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of China’s two major rivers is “pirating” water from the other, according to new research. Over the past 1.7 million years, the Yangtze River has been stealing water from the Yellow River, and the theft could worsen dangerously low water levels in the latter.

The Yangtze and Yellow Rivers are among the longest in the world. They stretch thousands of miles across China and supply hundreds of millions of people with water. And now, researchers estimate, the Yellow River has lost some five billion square meters of water to the Yangtze every year on average over the long term. The findings, which were published last week in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, add critical insight to China’s plans to combat water shortages caused by climate change and human overuse of the Yellow River. In other words, to reshape a river, you need to understand the ancient forces that are already acting on it.

If you were to float down the Yangtze, you’d look up to steep gorges. But if you took a ride down the Yellow River, the Yangtze’s sister river to the north, you’d see a more gradually inclining topography. Those geographic differences are evidence of a long-standing tug-of-war for water between the two rivers over millions of years—and the Yangtze appears to be the clear winner.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using a combination of field observations and modeling, researchers tracked several climate-fueled “capture events”—when one river hijacks water from another, essentially—between the Yangtze and the Yellow River from 1.7 million to 0.8 million years ago. The water captured by the Yangtze is so significant that it’s forcing a 3,000-kilometer-long divide between the two rivers’ headwaters to migrate, the researchers write in the study.

Map shows the location of the Shake River (a Yellow River tributary) and the Aqu River (a Yangtze River tributary) on either side of the boundary of the Yellow River and the Yangtze River Basins. A hook-shaped bend in the Aqu River is highlighted to show where river capture is occurring.

The geological war over water may have deep implications for the people who rely on the Yellow River for water. China plans to initially divert some four billion cubic meters of water from the Yangtze to the Yellow River annually in the first phase of part of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project—but that’s less water than what’s being captured by the Yangtze, the study authors warn.

“This highlights a profound disconnect between the timescales of landscape evolution and water resource engineering,” the researchers write.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe