Chinese Fossil May Be Mother of All Placental Mammals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: MARK A. KLINGER/CMNH

Researchers have unearthed the fossilized remains of what may be the mother of all placental mammals, so-named for the placenta that nourishes the young during gestation. The 125-million-year-old specimen is the earliest and most primitive known representative of the placental group, to which the vast majority of living mammals--humans among them--belong. Unlike other placentals known from the Cretaceous period, which exhibit adaptations to life on the ground, the newly discovered creature has features typical of climbers. As such it indicates that early placentals were a surprisingly motley crew. Discovered in the same quarry in northeastern China's Liaoning Province that previously yielded feathered dinosaurs, the fossil is also remarkable for its preservation: whereas most early mammal remains consist of just a few teeth or a jaw, the new find, dubbed Eomaia scansoria, is a nearly complete skeleton and even includes fur impressions.

Analysis of the creature's anatomy, conducted by Zhe-Xi Luo of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (CMNH) in Pittsburgh and colleagues, revealed an agile, insect-eating, shrewlike beast with hands and feet built for grasping and branch-walking (see image). The team suspects that Eomaia was active both on the ground and in trees and shrubs, much as the opossum is. In fact, the ability to climb may have given early placentals a competitive edge by enabling access to food sources and refuges not available to their land-bound contemporaries, observes Anne Weil of Duke University in a commentary accompanying the report. She cautions, however, against generalizing about all early placentals on the basis of this one skeleton (the next oldest placental skeletons are some 50 million years younger than Eomaia). Weil further notes that primitive marsupials, the pouched mammals, were also climbers. Thus it may be that the common ancestor of these two groups had that ability. Whatever the case, "our new study," remarks team member John Wible, also at the CMNH, "shows that, in the Cretaceous, there was a far greater burst of diversity of extinct relatives of placentals than anyone had previously realized."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe