Cincinnati Steam Fire Engine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS—A great deal has been published here and elsewhere on the subject of our steam fire engine, which is absolute nonsense. And inferences unfavorable to the inventor have been made on account of the wide-spread destruction of two conflagrations here, which took place recently. In one of them it was stated that upwards of twenty buildings were burned np; in the other, three buildings were destroyed, which rendered it obvious to the writer of this article that the affair was a humbug purely. In the article you published, April 9,1853, taken I believe from the " Enquirer," it is supposed " that it is impossible to get the engine to fires without cutting up the streets and destroying the bouldering." I desire to set you right, regarding the steam fire engine as a machine which must soon supersede the ordinary apparatus for ex tinguishing fires, and will therefore stat a few things which ought to remove any pre judice that may have originated from such statements. The steam engine has never'torn up the bouldered streets of our city These are of late construction, and extend over but. a small portion of the city, although we con template them finally to supersede the ordi nary paving. This last is of the common limestone, an extremely friable material, which wears into holes, the adjacent paving readily wearing out under any heavy pressure, such as log wheels or the steam engine, for example The introduction of a pay fiie de partment here has been nearly contempora neous with the introduction .of the steam fire engine, and the ill feeling with which certain companies, not then brought under the new arrangement, regarded the change, hindered prompt attendance and hearty co-operation at these fires. As to the twenty frame buildings destroy ed, no one here regards their destruction as a loss, and if they had been, a group of twenty frame buildings in proximity to each other anywhere, would doom them to the flames. I expect to obtain trom the ingenious inven tor of the engine, Abel Sharok, and from our city fire engineer, Mr. Bray, such a statement of the character, capacity, construction, and practical workings of the machine as will set the public, outside of Cincinnati, right upon this subject. . CHARLES CIST. Cincinnati, April 19, 1853.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 33This article was published with the title “Cincinnati Steam Fire Engine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 33 (), p. 259
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04301853-259

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe