Circular Saws

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Raleigh, N. C, Nov. 8, 1852. Messrs. Editors—In No. 1, Vol. 8, of the Scientific American, I see it stated (as I have in previous numbers) that in America five horse-power, is allotted for driving a large rip saw, and a larger circular saw. In this statement there must certainly be some mistake, and such an one as will mislead many persons who are unacquainted with larger circular saws, and particularly in this " Piney Woods " country, in buying steam engines for driving circular saws. A circular saw of 52 inches diameter, and running 4,600 feet per minute at the teeth, cannot be driven in yellow pine timber (with the saw its full depth in the log) with less than 12 horse-power, and not less than a fifteen horse-power engine, should be employed to do the work ; I have built and put up in this State some of the best steam saw mills in the United States, and I find nothing less than 12 horse-power will give anything like satisfaction; 4,600 feet per minute is considered by our best sawyers, to be full fast enough (with a half inch teed to the revolution) to do good and profitable sawing. Henry G. Bruce. [When applied to about buying an engine for driving a large circular saw, we have always advised the purchase ot a ten horsepower engine. But a nominal five horse-power engine, has been asserted by what was considered good authority—a wholesale manufacturer of machinery—the requisite power. We are much obliged to Mr. Bruce for this definite and practical information—Ed.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 10This article was published with the title “Circular Saws” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 10 (), p. 75
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11201852-75d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe