Circular Saws

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS. EDITORS—Being an engineer, millwright and machinist, I am an interested reader of your able, high- minded, and interesting paper. I find it assumes to be no more than what it really is, a record of science and truth, and a fearless advocate of correct principles and valuable improvements. I am with you in exposing those apparent improvements which are tounded on imaginary theories, and those which are equally as fallacious which are founded upon incorrect estimates and experiments. By this course your journal becomes a valuable instructor and a" check to the wild ambition of some of the inventors and engineers of the present age. Some fearless guide—some correct standard—is needed as a beacon to warn the public against adopting too hastily the conclusions of many so-called scientific men. I hive been engaged for some time in putting up steam engines and circular saws, and I have taken the liberty to suggest an idea or two in relation to them; those I have constructed are of the kind manufactured by Hoe Co. A great amount of time and money has been expended to bring these saws to perfection, and those who have seen them in operation will acknowledge that they are not exceeded by any in use. It is true that the same sized saw will not cut as wide plank as one without a shaft, and constructed alter the manner of some of those lately patented, but in point of economy they must be qtoite superior ; many difficulties will, I think, suggest themselves in the use of the saws without a shaft or spindle. There is too much machinery and what is used is not applied to advantage—the saw is too liable to bend, tco liable to get out of repair, and does not work with th" force and strength of a common circular saw ; a fifty-four inch circular saw constructed after the plan of those manufactured by Hoe Co.— (and \ set no value upon those saws above others equally as efficacious) —will run six hundred revolutions per minute, cutting j three-quarters ot an inch to each revolution. It must, in order to accomplish this result, be put up in mechanical style, and furnished with the requisite amount of- power and attention. No water is required to keep it cool when running at this rate. E. A. F.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 36This article was published with the title “Circular Saws” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 36 (), p. 283
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05211853-283c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe