Climate Change Linked to Amphibian Declines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: JOSEPH KIESECKER, Pennsylvania State University

Amphibian populations around the world have been declining at alarming rates for years, prompting a confounding variety of explanations from researchers. Now new research, reported today in the journal Nature, indicates that for at least one species, the cause is climate change.

Biologist Joseph Kiesecker of Pennsylvania State University and his colleagues reached this conclusion after investigating how differing water levels impacted the development of toad eggs in lakes and ponds in western North America. "For over 10 years, we have been collecting data at a number of sites in the Cascades, 4,000 to 7,000 feet above sea level, where there are large breeding populations of western toads," Kiesecker says. The team used boxes designed to anchor the toad eggs at various depths, to assess whether a thicker blanket of water protects the eggs from the harm of ultraviolet light.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We have found that water levels are shallower during years when there is less snow, which exposes the eggs to more ultraviolet light and makes them susceptible to disease outbreaks," Kiesecker explains. They found that the developing embryos were killed by a water-mold pathogen, Saprolegnia ferax, which usually only attacks organisms that are injured or under some sort of stress. "Around the early 1990s, we started to see 80 to 100 percent mortality," says Kiesecker.

Although Kiesecker sees global warming as the culprit in this specific case, he blames various causes of stress for amphibian declines around the world. "Our results indicate that interpreting the impacts of global climate change will require a detailed mechanistic understanding of local natural history coupled with long-term data that will permit us to gauge responses associated with climate change," he remarks. Team member Andrew Blaustein adds: "This study shows that if we want to understand the complex ecology of the world around us, we must start looking at the big picture, and there may not be simple or easy answers."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe