New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Climate Change Skepticism Fueled by Gut Reaction to Local Weather

The public’s perception of global warming is shaped by the weather that people experience

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If it’s hot outside, you’re more likely to believe in climate change.

The public perception of climate change is shaped by the weather that people experience, according to a study published yesterday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.

People who live in areas where high temperature records are broken are more likely to believe in global warming than those who do not. In areas that experienced record lows, people were less inclined to believe in the mainstream climate science that shows human activity is warming the Earth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


People see climate change through a local lens, said Robert Kaufmann, the study’s lead author and director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Studies at Boston University. And in many areas of the country, the climate is not changing in the same way that it is for the entire planet.

That, of course, doesn’t mean climate science is wrong, since it doesn’t claim that all parts of the planet will warm in the same way. But the study shows that people’s daily weather experiences does lead to skepticism in areas not breaking heat records, he said.

“When personal experience and expert opinion don’t align on a topic that’s not critical to an individual’s well-being, they’re going to go with their gut rather than what the expert tells them,” Kaufmann said.

Researchers noted that the discrepancy resulted from the public’s equating of weather with climate, which many assume are the same. When they head outside and the weather is extremely hot and humid, they are more likely to believe in a warming climate, which is a weather trend that lasts for decades. In addition, the term “global warming” has convinced many people that they must feel record warmth for the theory of a hotter planet to hold true, researchers found.

The areas where many heat records are broken, and where public perception is tilted in the direction of mainstream climate science, included much of the West Coast and the Northeast. Areas where there is a high level of climate skepticism and record-breaking cold include Ohio and much of the Mississippi River Valley.

I’ll make up my own mind

The study was released on the same day that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration declared November the fifth hottest on record and again noted that 2016 would likely be the hottest year on record for global temperatures. The contiguous United States experienced its fifth warmest November ever recorded, according to NOAA.

Despite the gap in perception, a majority of Americans want more political and corporate responsibility on climate change, according to a survey from Yale University’s climate change communication program, released last week.

A majority of Americans favor political action on global warming, despite the presidential victory of Donald Trump, who questions climate science, the survey found. It shows that almost two-thirds of registered voters across all parties want the Trump administration and Congress to do more to address global warming. Almost three-quarters of Republicans and about 90 percent of Democrats want corporations to do more on climate change.

“For the most part, Americans want major institutions that have a lot of power and influence to do more on the issue on global warming,” said Matt Cutler, a Yale University researcher.

Still, Kaufmann said it’s human nature to trust one’s own experience over scientific evidence or political wisdom.

“Unless it really affects my everyday life, I’m not going to spend time studying this issue, and I’m not necessarily going to believe scientists either, especially now that experts are held in such ill repute, but I’m going to make up my mind based on how I can see and feel climate change,” he said. “For many people, that is record-high and record-low temperatures.”

Reprinted from ClimateWire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe