New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Climate Changed Genetics of Canadian Lynx

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new report suggests that climatic variation can be as effective as geographic barriers are at isolating groups of animals. According to findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, weather differences could be responsible for the formation of distinct Canadian lynx populations.

In North America members of Lynx canadensis are divided into three geographical regions--the Pacific, Continental and Atlantic zones--each of which exhibits distinct genetic characteristics. Such genetic isolation within a species often occurs as a result of geographical hurdles, such as an island getting cut off from the mainland. Although the Rocky Mountains supply a barrier between the Pacific and Continental populations, no such obstacle exists between the Continental and Atlantic regions. Nils C. Stenseth of the University of Oslo and his colleagues analyzed genetic and census data on the Canadian lynx from as far back as 1897 and devised a computer model to integrate this information with climate records.

The new approach, dubbed climate forcing of ecological and evolutionary patterns (CEEP), demonstrated that weather patterns influence how the number of cats vary from year to year. These fluctuations are synchronized within each region, but all three demonstrate different patterns, which in turn boosts genetic isolation. The researchers plan to apply the model to study other species to determine if climate patterns have had a similar effect on other species as well.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe