Climate Changed Genetics of Canadian Lynx

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new report suggests that climatic variation can be as effective as geographic barriers are at isolating groups of animals. According to findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, weather differences could be responsible for the formation of distinct Canadian lynx populations.

In North America members of Lynx canadensis are divided into three geographical regions--the Pacific, Continental and Atlantic zones--each of which exhibits distinct genetic characteristics. Such genetic isolation within a species often occurs as a result of geographical hurdles, such as an island getting cut off from the mainland. Although the Rocky Mountains supply a barrier between the Pacific and Continental populations, no such obstacle exists between the Continental and Atlantic regions. Nils C. Stenseth of the University of Oslo and his colleagues analyzed genetic and census data on the Canadian lynx from as far back as 1897 and devised a computer model to integrate this information with climate records.

The new approach, dubbed climate forcing of ecological and evolutionary patterns (CEEP), demonstrated that weather patterns influence how the number of cats vary from year to year. These fluctuations are synchronized within each region, but all three demonstrate different patterns, which in turn boosts genetic isolation. The researchers plan to apply the model to study other species to determine if climate patterns have had a similar effect on other species as well.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe