New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Climate Effects of Contrails Confirmed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have long suspected that contrails, the trails of white exhaust that jets leave in their wake, can affect climate. Quantifying their effects was extremely difficult, however, because the nearly constant air traffic over most of Europe and North America made it impossible to study clear skies for comparison. But the grounding of commercial aircraft in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks provided just such an opportunity. Now a report published today in the journal Nature confirms that contrails' affect the range of temperatures recorded on the ground.

David J. Travis of the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater and his colleagues collected three decades of temperature data from nearly 4,000 weather stations across North America for the three-day periods before, during and after the air traffic moratorium. By comparing the so-called diurnal temperature range (DTR), which is the difference between daily highs and nightly lows, the team calculated that the range of temperatures was more than one degree Celsius greater in the absence of commercial air traffic. This increase was even more pronounced in regions reported to have the most contrail abundance, such as the midwest, northeast and northwest sections of the country.

Cloud cover (particularly high-level cirrus clouds that are primarily composed of ice crystals) insulates the planet by reflecting incoming radiation from the sun and trapping outgoing infrared radiation. Contrails, the researchers conclude, exacerbate this effect.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe