Why ‘Tipping Points’ Are the Wrong Way to Talk about Climate Change

A new paper warns the concept of “tipping points” doesn’t do much to encourage climate action from laypeople and policymakers

Drop of water from glacier

Meltwater drips from ice at an exposed portion of the Aletsch glacier on August 22, 2019 near Bettmeralp, Switzerland.

Sean Gallup/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | Unstoppable ice loss in Antarctica. Irreversible permafrost thaw in the Arctic. The shutdown of a gigantic Atlantic Ocean current.

Scientists have warned that these and other “tipping points” in the Earth’s climate system lie ahead if global temperatures continue to rise unabated. But there’s still great uncertainty about how and when the planet might cross these dangerous thresholds.

And without clearer public communication about what exactly a tipping point is — and what can be done to prevent it — the entire concept might not be that useful when it comes to promoting climate action.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That’s the warning presented in a new perspective paper, published Tuesday by a group of scientists, policy experts and communication specialists in the journal Nature Climate Change. Tipping points have captured the public’s imagination for years now, they argue — but it’s not clear the concept is driving any meaningful policy changes.

That’s partly due to widespread confusion about what a tipping point actually is, the paper suggests.

Early scientific literature on the subject presented the idea that certain aspects of the Earth’s climate system could have physical limits — and once the point of no return is crossed, these systems fall into a death spiral of unstoppable and irreversible change.

Studies suggest, for instance, that enough warming and drought in the Amazon could cause the ecosystem to tilt into an uncontrollable transformation from lush rainforest to dry grassland.

But over the years, as the concept has grown more popular, researchers have begun to apply the tipping point framework to a variety of other scientific and social systems. Papers have begun to suggest that there are tipping points in everything from energy pricing systems to humans’ eating habits.

Uncertainty over the likelihood of climate tipping points is another source of public confusion, the authors suggest.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.N.’s leading authority on climate science, has warned of a variety of possible tipping points in the Earth’s climate system. But some are more likely than others, and many are shrouded in uncertainty — in other words, scientists don’t know how close we are to toppling them.

That makes it hard to communicate the seriousness of tipping point threats or to inspire near-term action to prevent them.

If scientists knew for certain the Antarctic ice sheet would experience rapid and uncontrollable melting with exactly 1.5 degrees of global warming, policymakers might be more inclined to implement emergency measures to keep temperatures below that threshold.

But almost all global tipping point thresholds come with a wide range of uncertainty about when they’ll actually occur — if ever.

Instead, the authors argued, more tangible and immediate climate emergencies — such as extreme weather events, which are worsening around the globe as temperatures rise — may be more likely to inspire a greater sense of urgency among policymakers and the public.

That doesn’t mean tipping points can’t still be a useful concept in public messaging about climate change, the authors added. But scientists should communicate more clearly about their definitions and uncertainties.

That's because climate tipping points are still a major threat — even if their exact thresholds are still uncertain.

A major report last year — with contributions from more than 200 scientists — warned of 26 possible tipping points around the globe, affecting systems from ice sheets to tropical cloud cover.

It’s an issue that urgently requires more research and understanding, the report warned.

“We know enough to identify that the threat of Earth system tipping points demands an urgent response. Indeed, our best models likely underestimate tipping point risks,” it stated. “The world is largely flying blind into this vast threat.”

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2024. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Chelsea Harvey covers climate science for Climatewire. She tracks the big questions being asked by researchers and explains what's known, and what needs to be, about global temperatures. Chelsea began writing about climate science in 2014. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Popular Science, Men's Journal and others.

More by Chelsea Harvey

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe