Climbing Trees Is a Breeze

Scaling a rope tests human strength and endurance such that it would quickly weed out competitors on a game show like American Gladiators .

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scaling a rope tests human strength and endurance such that it would quickly weed out competitors on a game show like American Gladiators. For small primates? Not so much. Duke University researchers tested the climbing prowess of five different species of primate, ranging in weight from 0.4 to 3.1 pounds (0.2 to 1.4 kilograms), on the hanging-rope equivalent of a treadmill. After 15 to 30 minutes climbing at top speed, the primates' oxygen intake had barely budged relative to a brisk walk. And unlike walking, climbing did not exact an increasing oxygen toll depending on the animal's size—suggesting the biomechanics of the two forms of locomotion may fundamentally differ, the researchers report in a recent issue of Science. They say the findings suggest an advantage that early primates may have had over other tree-climbers: the ability to explore new arboreal environments without pooping themselves out.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe