New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cloaking Made Simpler

Invisibility without sophisticated metamaterials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In recent years optics researchers have come up with numerous concepts for invisibility cloaks—camouflaging that would effectively reroute light around an object to be concealed. Most of these approaches have relied on so-called metamaterials, which are carefully engineered structures that have bizarre optical properties. A much simpler cloaking apparatus could do away with the need for metamaterials entirely.

Researchers at BAE Systems in Washington, D.C., Towson University and Purdue University have devised a cloaking device based on two gold surfaces, one coated on a curved lens and one on a flat piece of glass. Stacked together, they can conceal an area in between by forming what is known as a tapered waveguide. The trick lies in the gradient of the material’s refractive index, which allows light shining parallel into the stack to bend around a central area “like water flowing around a stone,” says study co-author Vladimir M. Shalaev, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Purdue.

Shalaev was part of a group that in 2007 designed a visible-light cloak using metamaterials. But that cloak worked only at a predefined wavelength of light and concealed a very small area. In contrast, the waveguide appears to work for multiple wavelengths of visible light and can hide a bigger area. “From the very beginning we realized the huge challenge” of making such a cloak, Shalaev says. “It’s not fundamentally impossible, but it’s really, really hard.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


John Pendry, a physicist at Imperial College London, says that the tapered waveguide strategy is “a very clever idea.” Physicist Ulf Leonhardt of the University of Saint Andrews in Scotland agrees, calling the paper, in the May 29 Physical Review Letters, “a brilliant piece of work, a wonderfully simple idea.” Both researchers point out, however, that the new approach conceals a two-dimensional area rather than a three-dimensional one. “The things you might want to cloak are probably not confined to two dimensions,” Pendry remarks. Still, the system could find use in optical communications.

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 301 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Cloaking Made Simpler” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 301 No. 2 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0809-23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe