Cloaking Made Simpler

Invisibility without sophisticated metamaterials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In recent years optics researchers have come up with numerous concepts for invisibility cloaks—camouflaging that would effectively reroute light around an object to be concealed. Most of these approaches have relied on so-called metamaterials, which are carefully engineered structures that have bizarre optical properties. A much simpler cloaking apparatus could do away with the need for metamaterials entirely.

Researchers at BAE Systems in Washington, D.C., Towson University and Purdue University have devised a cloaking device based on two gold surfaces, one coated on a curved lens and one on a flat piece of glass. Stacked together, they can conceal an area in between by forming what is known as a tapered waveguide. The trick lies in the gradient of the material’s refractive index, which allows light shining parallel into the stack to bend around a central area “like water flowing around a stone,” says study co-author Vladimir M. Shalaev, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Purdue.

Shalaev was part of a group that in 2007 designed a visible-light cloak using metamaterials. But that cloak worked only at a predefined wavelength of light and concealed a very small area. In contrast, the waveguide appears to work for multiple wavelengths of visible light and can hide a bigger area. “From the very beginning we realized the huge challenge” of making such a cloak, Shalaev says. “It’s not fundamentally impossible, but it’s really, really hard.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


John Pendry, a physicist at Imperial College London, says that the tapered waveguide strategy is “a very clever idea.” Physicist Ulf Leonhardt of the University of Saint Andrews in Scotland agrees, calling the paper, in the May 29 Physical Review Letters, “a brilliant piece of work, a wonderfully simple idea.” Both researchers point out, however, that the new approach conceals a two-dimensional area rather than a three-dimensional one. “The things you might want to cloak are probably not confined to two dimensions,” Pendry remarks. Still, the system could find use in optical communications.

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 301 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Cloaking Made Simpler” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 301 No. 2 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0809-23

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe