New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Cloned Cows Manufacture Cancer Treatment

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The products most closely associated with cows are milk and beef. But European scientists report today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that the animals can be bred to generate antitumor drugs. The findings could lead to a novel way of manufacturing antibodies for tumor therapy on a large scale.

Drugs employing antibodies that recognize proteins found only on cancerous cells tend to work more effectively when paired with a second type of antibody that targets immune cells. But these so-called bispecific antibodies are difficult to produce, so Gottfried Brem of the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna and his colleagues tried a new approach. The researchers first linked two genes, one that targets human melanoma cells and one that activates T cells, and inserted the resulting genetic sequence into cow embryos. The nine animals that developed (see image) had high levels of the desired designer antibody, called r28M, in their bloodstreams. The scientists were able to extract and purify significant quantities of r28M, and test it against human melanoma cells. According to the report, the protein is stable and successfully targeted and killed cancer cells in laboratory tests.

The authors suggest that this gene farming approach could be tailored to produce a variety of proteins. Their results, they conclude, emphasize "the fact that blood cells can be directed to produce high concentrations of fully active therapeutic molecules that are otherwise difficult to express."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe