Cloned GM Piglets May Pave Way to Xenotransplantation Success

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: University of Missouri; PHOTOGRAPHED BY JIM CURLEY

Given the limited supply of human organs available to patients who need replacements, scientists have long dreamed of being able to use other species as organ sources. Considering their body size, breeding characteristics and the fact that they are bred for food, pigs are generally viewed as the most appropriate prospective donors. Problematically, however, pig cells sport sugar molecules on their surfaces that can trigger a violent immune response in the transplant recipient¿an assault that can kill the donor organ in minutes. Efforts to outfit the organs with protective proteins have succeeded only in delaying rejection for a few months. But new research results suggest that a solution to the conundrum now lies within reach. According to a report released today by the journal Science, investigators have cloned a group of pigs genetically engineered to partially lack a key component of this immune response. The achievement could represent a major step toward making the dream of successful xenotransplantation a reality.

To make their pigs, Randall S. Prather of the University of Missouri and his colleagues started with fetal pig cells, "knocking out" a copy of the gene responsible for making the inflammatory sugar molecules. They then fused the modified pig cells with pig eggs and implanted the 3,000 cloned embryos in surrogate sows. The four resulting piglets that have survived each carry one inactive copy of the gene and one active one. The pigs can still manufacture the sugar molecules with the one active copy of the gene, though. To eliminate the sugar production altogether, researchers will have to produce swine in which both copies of the relevant gene are inactive¿a goal that Prather told Science he hopes to achieve within 18 months.

"Xenotransplantation," by Robert P. Lanza, David K. C. Cooper and William L. Chick (Scientific American, July 1997), is available for purchase from the Scientific American Archive.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe