Closer Look at Meteor Trail Reveals Surprisingly Large Particles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On September 3, 2004, a nearly one-million-kilogram asteroid disintegrated as it entered Earth's atmosphere, releasing as much energy as a nuclear bomb. Satellites got a close-up view of the explosion and allowed researchers to study the resulting cloud in unprecedented detail.

When meteoroids break up into tiny fragments on contact with our planet's atmosphere they leave behind a visible trail, which observers can enjoy as "shooting stars" and meteor showers. (The image is an artist's interpretation of a midsize meteor.) According to theory, most of the particles produced during the breakup are just a few nanometers across. Using infrared and light sensor readings from orbiting satellites, Andrew Klekociuk of the Australian Antarctic Division and his colleagues analyzed the makeup of the meteoric smoke produced by the September 2004 event. They found that many of the pieces of debris were in fact much larger than expected, measuring up to 20 micrometers across.

If further investigation finds that the latest results are typical, there could be implications for scientists' understanding of Earth's climate, the authors suggest. Because aerosol particles from 0.05 to one micrometer across can effectively scatter light and radiation as well as catalyze atmospheric reactions, meteoritic dust--which stays in the atmosphere for weeks to months--could play a larger role in climate forcing and ozone depletion than previously believed. A report detailing the findings is published today in the journal Nature.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe