Clues to Aggressive, Stubborn Cancers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cancer manifests itself in many ways, not only in terms of the types of tissues it attacks, but also in the way it unfolds. Some cancers proceed slowly; others spread aggressively. Some respond predictably to chemotherapy drugs; others develop resistance. Now new research, published today in the journal Nature, is providing insight into these differences. According to the report, a genetic mutation of a protein called MAD2 may hold the key.

Earlier studies had shown that MAD2 belongs to a class of proteins known as mitotic checkpoint proteins, which ensure proper distribution of the chromosomes during cell division. Without that checkpoint, entire chromosomes can be gained or lost, and when such chromosomal instability occurs in cancer cells, it often results in aggressive cancers. The previous research had shown a correlation between the missing mitotic checkpoint and chromosomal instability in cancer cell lines, but there was no evidence for a direct link.

To that end, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center researchers Loren S. Michel and Vasco Liberal and their colleagues genetically engineered a MAD2 mutation in a line of stable human colon cancer cells. The results were dramatic. "Although the loss of one copy of MAD2 caused only subtle decreases in the amount of MAD2 protein levels, it had a great impact on the cell's genetic behavior," Michel reports. "The tumors became highly genomically unstable and continued to grow even in the presence of chemotherapy drugs in the taxane family." In addition to affecting pre-existing cancer cells, the team found that inactivation of MAD2 in mice led to cancer, especially cancer of the lungs. "Why lung tissue is specifically affected is unknown, but it does show that disruption of this process participates in the development of cancer," Liberal notes. "Interestingly, in humans, low levels of MAD2 have been observed in breast tumor cell lines."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe