Clues to the Earth's Heat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Neutrinos and antineutrinos detected in laboratories are normally generated by stars and nuclear reactors. An international team of physicists now has picked up neutrinos emanating from inside the earth. The antineutrino detector KamLAND, made up of nearly 2,000 light sensors placed around 1,000 tons of oil and fluorescent dye buried in a mine cavern in Japan, recorded roughly one antineutrino a month generated by the decay of uranium 238 and thorium 232 deep within the planet. The findings, in the July 28 Nature, suggest that the origin of the 30 trillion to 45 trillion watts of heat produced by the earth’s interior is about evenly divided between radioactive decay and leftover heat from the planet’s molten formation. Because the sound waves used to study the inner earth yield little about its chemistry, geoneutrinos should help shed light on the location and concentration of unstable elements.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Clues to the Earth's Heat” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 4 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1005-32d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe