New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Clues to the Earth's Heat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Neutrinos and antineutrinos detected in laboratories are normally generated by stars and nuclear reactors. An international team of physicists now has picked up neutrinos emanating from inside the earth. The antineutrino detector KamLAND, made up of nearly 2,000 light sensors placed around 1,000 tons of oil and fluorescent dye buried in a mine cavern in Japan, recorded roughly one antineutrino a month generated by the decay of uranium 238 and thorium 232 deep within the planet. The findings, in the July 28 Nature, suggest that the origin of the 30 trillion to 45 trillion watts of heat produced by the earth’s interior is about evenly divided between radioactive decay and leftover heat from the planet’s molten formation. Because the sound waves used to study the inner earth yield little about its chemistry, geoneutrinos should help shed light on the location and concentration of unstable elements.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Clues to the Earth's Heat” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 4 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1005-32d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe