New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

C'mere, Big Boy

Studies suggest that ovulating women experience a human version of "heat"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most female mammals go into some form of estrus, or heat, when fertile, displaying hormone-induced behavioral changes that mark ovulation. Scientists used to think that humans were the exception, but evidence is mounting that women may undergo their own, albeit subtler, period of heat.

A number of recent studies have shown that ovulating women appear—and even smell—more attractive to men. And a recent University of New Mexico study found that female strippers earn up to twice as much tip money during their most fertile period as compared with other times.

But Meghan P. Provost, a psychologist at Mount Saint Vincent University in Halifax, says that women in heat are not interested in just any man. Research suggests that ovulating women favor men who have more masculine qualities, such as a strong jawline. And Provost recently published work showing that women’s walks appeared sexier to men when they were not in the fertile phase of their cycle. Provost says that one explanation for this surprising result is that the attractive cues women give off when fertile are intended for people they choose to interact with, whereas walking is more public.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Psychologist Geoffrey Miller, who led the New Mexico study, notes that this pickiness does not make us so different from our caterwauling primate relatives. “It’s a common misconception that females are always promiscuous during heat,” Miller says. “In most species females are being very choosy.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe