Coal—How it May and Must be Cheapened

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All agree that coal is absurdly, extortionately,cruelly high; but all do not agree as to the cause of present high prices, or as to how it may be cheapened The free traders say the high price is dependent on the present tariff, while some protectionists say it is owing to extortionate freights and high prices demanded by miners We say it is a combination of all the causes assigned While we have been and still are protectionists within what we consider the legitimate meaning of that term, we say remove the tariff on coal, at least until such time as it may become apparent that it needs some protection At present it is perfectly plain " the shoe is on the other foot" But when this is done only a small part is done We need additional and competing lines of transit trom the great beds of coal to the principal centers ot trade, and we need more labor; the want of a proper labor supply being, in our opinion, one of the chief causes of trouble This labor can be found in abundance in Asia It only waits to be properly invited It is just the kind of labor wanted for the purpose, and the coal strikers may rest assured that if it be once called into request, public opinion will sustain it against all intrigue, and threatened or attempted outrage Cheap coal we may have, and must have, and all parties implicated in the present stringency had better take heed lest they carry things just beyond the limit of the proverbially elastic American patience We say to these people so long as you protect the public we go in heart and hand to protect your industry, but not one fraction of a moment longer And we say the same to all other industries the people have been willing to aid by tariff on foreign importations We are sorry to say it, but the present high prices of coal are doing more to build up the doctrines of free trade than all the writings of its advocates, or speeches of clergymen, college professors, and demagogues, upon the much misunderstood and abused subject of protection If only the coal trade would be likely to suffer by the reaction which the present state of things will cause, we should not grieve, but we fear that the prosperity of other important industries will be also imperiled Many will be so illogical as to reason that if a tariff is not needed on coal it is not; needed on anything Now the only way to make such a conclusion tenable is to sheapen labor Let people take their choice, but remember that labor cheapened by a supply adequate to the demand will not be likely to soon recover its present power Testing; Opium Professor Schneider has proposed, in the sixth revised edition of the Pharmacopoeia Austriaca, the following method for testing the goodness of opium : Ten grammes of previously dried and powered opium are treated with a mixture of 150 grammes ol distilled water, to which 20 grammes of pure hydrochloric acid, sp gr 1'lSJ, are added; the residue, after extraction, should not exceed 45 grammes weight ; ta the acid fluid 20 grammes of common salt are added, and the precipitate thereby caused is collected, after 24 hours, on a filter, and the latter washed with a solution of common salt; to the filtrate ammonia is added, and the fluid left standing again for 24 hours; the crystals which have separated are collected, redissolved in acetic acid, and precipitated with ammonia ; the precipitate so obtained is washed, dried, and weighed; its weight should not be less than 1 gramme

Scientific American Magazine Vol 21 Issue 8This article was published with the title “Coal—How it May and Must be Cheapened” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 21 No. 8 (), p. 122
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08211869-122b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe