Cocaine Addiction Linked to Differences in Brain Structure

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

A new imaging study reveals that the brains of cocaine addicts are altered compared to those of nondrug users. Specifically, the volume of the amygdala, a brain region associated with the ability to judge consequences, is significantly smaller in heavy drug users.

Previous research revealed that the amygdala exhibits reduced activity in drug addicts during periods of cravings. In the new work, Hans C. Breiter of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and his colleagues used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study the brains of 27 cocaine addicts and a matched group of nonaddicts. They determined that the almond-shaped amygdala was between 13 and 23 percent smaller by volume in addicts than it was in the control subjects. ¿In combination with other work this study suggests that, when the opportunity for excitement presents itself, some people cannot make good judgements--just like teenagers who take excessive risks in pursuit of thrills,¿ says study co-author David R. Gastfriend, also at MGH. ¿It looks like this is a continuing problem for people with cocaine addiction, and now we know where in the brain that problem resides.¿

It remains unclear whether cocaine use induces changes to the brain's structure or if a smaller amygdala might make a person more susceptible to cocaine addiction. The researchers note that long-term studies of addicts, as well as family-based studies, could help clarify whether this brain feature is a cause or an effect. ¿No matter if these changes reflect a predisposition to addiction or very rapid degenerative changes, there are clear public policy implications,¿ Breiter remarks. ¿Further research will help us better understand the implications of these changes and develop ways to apply them to preventing or treating cocaine addiction.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American