Cocaine Addiction Linked to Differences in Brain Structure

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

A new imaging study reveals that the brains of cocaine addicts are altered compared to those of nondrug users. Specifically, the volume of the amygdala, a brain region associated with the ability to judge consequences, is significantly smaller in heavy drug users.

Previous research revealed that the amygdala exhibits reduced activity in drug addicts during periods of cravings. In the new work, Hans C. Breiter of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and his colleagues used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study the brains of 27 cocaine addicts and a matched group of nonaddicts. They determined that the almond-shaped amygdala was between 13 and 23 percent smaller by volume in addicts than it was in the control subjects. ¿In combination with other work this study suggests that, when the opportunity for excitement presents itself, some people cannot make good judgements--just like teenagers who take excessive risks in pursuit of thrills,¿ says study co-author David R. Gastfriend, also at MGH. ¿It looks like this is a continuing problem for people with cocaine addiction, and now we know where in the brain that problem resides.¿

It remains unclear whether cocaine use induces changes to the brain's structure or if a smaller amygdala might make a person more susceptible to cocaine addiction. The researchers note that long-term studies of addicts, as well as family-based studies, could help clarify whether this brain feature is a cause or an effect. ¿No matter if these changes reflect a predisposition to addiction or very rapid degenerative changes, there are clear public policy implications,¿ Breiter remarks. ¿Further research will help us better understand the implications of these changes and develop ways to apply them to preventing or treating cocaine addiction.¿

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American