Codon Spell Check

Silent mutations are not so silent after all

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As any diplomat will attest, nuances in language can dramatically affect the success of communication. But because the idiom of human cells was assumed to be much more literal than that of whole people, a recent discovery surprised even the scientists who made it. Researchers at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) identified a human protein that takes two distinct shapes depending on a subtle difference in its gene that should not make any difference at all. Their finding may explain variations in chemotherapy response among certain cancer patients and raises new questions concerning so-called silent mutations.

Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty and Michael M. Gottesman were examining a gene called MDR1, which is named for its association with multiple-drug resistance in tumor cells. Specifically, they looked at mutations called single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MDR1. Some did not change the amino acid sequence encoded by the gene, so the scientists assumed they could have no effect on the final protein. Still, those synonymous SNPs kept showing up in studies of cancer patients, sometimes seeming to influence drug response. "It drew our attention because there were so many reports, and often really contradicting each other," Kimchi-Sarfaty says, "so we started to explore."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe