New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cohabitating Hominids

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The human ancestral family tree just got a lot bushier: a newly discovered fossil supports the notion that Homo habilis may not have evolved into the larger Homo erectus. Researchers have found an H. habilis jawbone near Kenya's Lake Turkana that dates to 1.44 million years ago, when H. erectus also roamed the area. If the two early hominids coexisted, then they probably evolved separately from a common ancestor. The oldest habilis and erectus fossils found in East Africa date to 1.9 million years ago, indicating that they cohabited in the region for half a million years and that the species' shared ancestor would have had to have lived two million to three million years ago. But whether it was much different from both or resembled the older habilis is unknown: the only remains from this time are some skull fragments and a few teeth. Dig up the study in the August 9 Nature.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe