Cold War Weapons Testing Increased Human DNA Mutation Rate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Cold War ended more than a decade ago, but scientists continue to assess its effects. From 1949 to 1956, a series of aboveground Soviet atomic tests at the Semipalatinsk nuclear facility in Kazakhstan exposed the local population to varying doses of ionizing radiation. Now, some 40 years later, researchers have discovered a significant increase in the genetic mutation rates of several generations of families that lived nearby. The findings appear in the current issue of the journal Science.

Researchers led by Yuri Dubrova of the University of Leicester analyzed blood samples collected from three generations of some 40 families in Beskaragai, a rural district neighboring the Semipalatinsk site. Specifically, the group looked at so-called minisatellite DNA¿short, repeating sequences sprinkled throughout the genome that are prone to mutation. Comparisons of the heritable mutation rates in these people with those of a nonirradiated, but similar population in Kazakhstan revealed considerable differences. The team found a nearly 80 percent increase in the mutation rate in individuals directly exposed to the radioactive fallout. Even the children of affected individuals showed a 50 percent mutation rate increase over their nonirradiated counterparts. The mutation rates declined steadily after the 1950s, however.

The health consequences of such elevated mutation rates, if any, remain unknown. The study does suggest, though, that the 1963 Moscow treaty banning atmospheric nuclear testing spared a number of people from further genetic mutation.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe