New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Colliding Clusters Shed Light on Dark Matter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For more than 70 years, astronomers, cosmologists and physicists have known that ordinary matter must be surrounded by vast quantities of an invisible substance--not substantial enough to collide with atoms or stars but massive enough to keep galaxies from flying apart. Dubbed dark matter, the mysterious stuff has eluded detection through any means other than its gravitational impact, leading some to propose that Einstein's general relativity fails to adequately describe how gravity actually works on galactic scales. Now a relatively recent collision of two galaxy clusters has lifted the veil between ordinary and dark matter, proving the latter must exist.

Douglas Clowe of the University of Arizona and a team of astronomers observed the colliding clusters--known as the bullet cluster thanks to a cloud of hot gas deformed into a ballistic shape--using the Chandra X-ray Observatory. The eponymous shape formed when the superheated plasma of the larger cluster put a drag on the million-degree hydrogen and helium gas in the smaller one as they smashed into one another. But although they are colliding, the ordinary matter in the constituent galaxies, due to the vast distances between component stars, pass through each other without incident.

The galactic stars in a given cluster only make up roughly 1 to 2 percent of the mass, whereas plasma comprises anywhere from 5 to 15 percent. As the galaxies pass while the plasma is dragged, the resulting separation allowed the scientists to determine the gravitational strength of the various parts of galactic matter from that of the plasma by viewing how light passing near the cluster is bent--so-called gravitational lensing--thus potentially revealing dark matter for the very first time. Because the gas cloud is more massive, the lensing it creates should be more pronounced. On the other hand, if the galaxies have dark matter halos that continue to travel with them--as predicted by theory--then this relatively small amount of ordinary matter should exert an outsized lensing effect due to its invisible companion.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Observations with several other telescopes, including NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, proved that light from stars behind the colliding clusters responded to the greater gravity of the puny galaxies rather than the plasma clouds. "There has always been degeneracy before: you either needed lots of dark matter to explain the extra gravity or gravity doesn't obey the same physical laws on these million light-year scales as it does in our solar system," Clowe explains. "Our observations showed that the dark matter has to be there regardless of how gravity behaves on these large scales."

This proof of existence, appearing in an upcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters, does nothing to reveal what dark matter really is, however. "Over the years, we've pretty much ruled out all sorts of baryonic dark matter possibilities like brown dwarfs or black holes. We're pretty much left with some new subatomic particles," notes team member Dennis Zaritsky of the University of Arizona. "It's a little embarrassing to claim we know anything about the universe when we don't know what 90 percent of the matter out there is."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe