Color Is Quickest Decoder

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The average person can focus on only three objects at once, yet he or she can follow a soccer game and accurately estimate, in just half a second, how many players from each team are on the field. Justin Halberda, a Johns Hopkins University psychologist, explains that “people can focus on more than three items at a time if those items share a common color.” The color coding enables them to perceive separate individuals as a single set.

Halberda showed volunteers arrays of colored dots for 500 milliseconds—too brief for counting—then asked how many dots of a given color they had observed. Even with scenes of 35 dots in several colors, participants were 87 percent accurate, which indicates the human brain can carry out parallel processing of sets in a short time. Color, Halberda says, seems to be the easiest “sorting tool,” but he is now looking at arrays differing in size, shape and brightness. If another feature holds up, perhaps Italy’s il Azzurri and France’s les Bleus can both wear their blue home uniforms in the next World Cup soccer final.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Color Is Quickest Decoder” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 5 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1006-6

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe