Combating Malaria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each year malaria infects up to 500 million people worldwide. More than a million succumb to the deadly disease, most of them children. For years the medical community combated the disease with chloroquine--a cheap, effective drug that did much to alleviate the situation. But chloroquine-resistant malaria emerged and spread over the next few decades. Today resistant strains flourish in Asia, Africa and South America. Research reported in the October 20 issue of the journal Molecular Cell, however, may eventually change that. According to the new study, scientists have identified the gene that makes the malaria parasite resistant to chloroquine. The finding could facilitate efforts to develop drugs to treat the disease. Furthermore, it could allow for the return of chloroquine itself.

Because the malaria parasite took a relatively long time to develop chloroquine resistance, investigators had suspected that many genes were involved. But Thomas Wellems of the National Insitute of Allergies and Infectious Disease and his colleagues found that, in fact, only between four and eight mutations in a single gene dubbed pfcrt determine whether the parasite line is resistant or not. Considering that, the team believes it might be able to tweak the chloroquine composition so that it will work against the parasite once more.

In related news, the latest updates on other antimalarial tactics are described in the October 20 issue of the journal Science. The outlook is encouraging: within five to 10 years scientists think they will have a successful malaria vaccine. And before that a Chinese herbal remedy known as artesunate may be made available. Yet as new resistant strains arise, positive results can't come soon enough.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe