Combatting Depression with Exercise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Regular excercise may fight depression as effectively as prescription medication does, researchers say. According to a report published in the September/October issue of the journal Psychosomatic Medicine, patients who followed a modest excercise regimen fared as well as patients who took the antidepressant known as Zoloft.

Some 150 volunteers, all of whom were at least 50 years old and diagnosed with depression, followed one of three treatment programs: exercise, Zoloft or a combination of both. Participants in the exercise group worked out on a treadmill or stationary bicycle at 70 to 85 percent of their maximum heart rate for 30 minutes three times a week. Those receiving combination treatment followed the same exercise routine. At the end of the four-month study period, all three groups displayed significantly lower depression rates. Moreover, follow-up examinations six months later revealed that subjects in the excercise group experienced significantly lower relapse rates than those given the Zoloft or combination treatments.

Exactly why people in the combination group did not experience the same long-term benefits as those in the exercise-only group is unclear. But lead author James A. Blumenthal of Duke University speculates that "it is conceivable that the concurrent use of medication may undermine the psychological benefits of exercise by prioritizing an alternative, less self-confirming attribution for one's improved condition." That is, rather than feeling that their hard work had paid off, patients in the combination group may have attributed their improved mental state to the medication alone.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As impressive as these results are, the researchers caution that exercise may not bring relief to every person suffering from depression since, Blumenthal says, "exercise prescribed by a clinician may not be accepted and complied with to the same extent as when it is sought out and adopted on one's own," as in the case of the study participants. "The question remains whether the impressive results of this study will be applicable to the general population of middle-aged and older patients with major depressive disorders."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe