On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In the course of the Space Age, planets have gone from astronomical objects--wandering specks in the night sky--to geologic ones: full-fledged worlds you could imagine yourself walking on. In the 1990s asteroids made the same transition. And now it is comets' turn, as exemplified by July's (deliberate) crash of the Deep Impact probe into the nucleus of Comet Tempel 1. In September researchers announced a batch of findings at an American Astronomical Society meeting in Cambridge, England.
The impact threw up a cone of dusty debris some 500 meters high; it extended right from the surface, indicating that the cometary material put up no significant resistance to the projectile. The flight path of debris particles revealed the strength of the comet's gravity, hence its density--on average, about half that of water. The body must be riddled with voids. So much fine dust flew out that it could not have been created by the impact itself but rather must have already been sitting on the surface. A lack of big pieces suggests that the comet has no outer crust.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
