Commercial Activity Still Presents a Serious Threat to Many Whale Species

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This week in London, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meets to discuss a range of issues¿among them Iceland's application to rejoin the group, and Norway and Japan's whaling practices, which completely ignore a moratorium on commercial whaling that the IWC issued in 1986. To help fuel these conversations, the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) has recently released several provocative reports.

Last week, the IFAW announced that new DNA research they commissioned reveals that Japanese food markets are selling meat from protected species of whale, proving that Japanese whalers are disregarding international conventions. IFAW-funded researchers purchased 129 samples of meat from whale markets for analysis and discovered that two were humpbacks, five were fin whale, one was sei whale, two were beaked whales, 14 were dolphin and one was horse.

In another release, the IFAW alleged that Japan and Norway¿countries that each hunt more than 1,000 whales per year¿now plan to expand their efforts. The organization used pollster Fred Steeper of Market Strategies, Inc. to gage attitudes in the U.S. and found that majorities of Americans are concerned about Japanese and Norwegian whaling. As a countermeasure to the threat of continued commercial whaling, the IWC is also expected to vote this week on a proposal to create a whale sanctuary in the South Pacific.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe