New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Commercial Activity Still Presents a Serious Threat to Many Whale Species

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This week in London, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meets to discuss a range of issues¿among them Iceland's application to rejoin the group, and Norway and Japan's whaling practices, which completely ignore a moratorium on commercial whaling that the IWC issued in 1986. To help fuel these conversations, the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) has recently released several provocative reports.

Last week, the IFAW announced that new DNA research they commissioned reveals that Japanese food markets are selling meat from protected species of whale, proving that Japanese whalers are disregarding international conventions. IFAW-funded researchers purchased 129 samples of meat from whale markets for analysis and discovered that two were humpbacks, five were fin whale, one was sei whale, two were beaked whales, 14 were dolphin and one was horse.

In another release, the IFAW alleged that Japan and Norway¿countries that each hunt more than 1,000 whales per year¿now plan to expand their efforts. The organization used pollster Fred Steeper of Market Strategies, Inc. to gage attitudes in the U.S. and found that majorities of Americans are concerned about Japanese and Norwegian whaling. As a countermeasure to the threat of continued commercial whaling, the IWC is also expected to vote this week on a proposal to create a whale sanctuary in the South Pacific.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe