Common Mushrooms Produce Unique Pigments

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Lowly fungi are surprisingly proficient chemical factories, often motivating scientists to turn to them for inspiration for new pharmacologically active substances. Apparently, fungi are creative when it comes to pigments, too. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Angewandte Chemie International, researchers have isolated novel yellow pigments with unusual structures from two types of toadstool.

Wolfgang Steglich of Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich and his colleagues extracted fruiting bodies from the common earthball mushroom Chalciporus piperatus. After a careful purification procedure, the researchers isolated a previously unknown pigment, which they dubbed sclerocitrin. Ripe earthballs produce an impressive amount of the color compound: from a kilogram of fungus, the team recovered 400 milligrams of the bright yellow chemical. After identifying sclerocitrin, the scientists also detected it in the stem bases of a second type of mushroom, the peppery bolete. In addition, the peppery bolete produces its own unique yellow pigment, which the team christened chalcitrin.

The researchers propose synthesis routes for the two chemicals that suggest the fungi produce them from a third, previously known pigment. The team next plans to test the novel chemicals for interesting biological activity.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American