New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Compound Derived from Broccoli Destroys Ulcer-Causing Bacterium

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There may soon be yet another reason to eat plenty of vegetables. According to a report published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a compound found in broccoli can kill the bacterium responsible for the majority of ulcers and stomach cancers. If food sources of the substance prove to be similarly successful, they could lead to new forms of treatment for a bacterial infection that affects large numbers of people in developing countries.

The culprit bacterium, Helicobacter pylori, succumbs to powerful antibiotic treatment in more than 80 percent of cases. But in regions of Central and South America, Africa and Asia, where as much as 80 percent of the population is infected as a result of poor sanitation conditions, administering the required medication has proved difficult. After hearing of people suffering from ulcers who experienced relief of their symptoms after consuming three-day-old broccoli sprouts, Jed W. Fahey of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and his colleagues began investigating the plants. Specifically, they isolated a compound from broccoli seeds known as sulforaphane and tested its effects on H. pylori. They found that purified sulforaphane killed 48 different strains of H. pylori, including ones resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Moreover, the compound destroyed the bacterium both inside and outside of cells.

Further research is needed to determine if dietary sources of sulforaphane will be as adept as pure sulforaphane at eliminating H. pylori. "If future clinical studies show that a food can relieve or prevent diseases associated with this bacterium in people," Fahey notes, "it could have significant public health implications in the U.S. and around the world."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe