New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Could "Computational Sprinting" Speed Up Smart Phones without Burning Them Out?

Researchers study the idea of alternately powering up and then cooling down mobile processors to squeeze out better performance without overheating

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The demands placed on smart phones by marathon sessions of texting, streaming video and surfing the Web require that they have blazing-fast processors while, at the same time, be able to disburse the heat these processors generate. A team of engineers is proposing something of a counterintuitive model to designing smart phones in the future—one that has processors alternately powering up and then cooling down, more like sprinters than long-distance runners.

Heat dissipation has become a major limitation to the computational power of processors used in smart phones, where there is no room for a fan or other type of cooling system. Only a fraction of the transistors on a smart phone's processor can safely operate at a time. The transistors that are shut down are known as "dark silicon." According to the researchers, more transistors will only lead to more dark silicon because improvements in the processors' ability to dissipate heat are lagging.

University of Pennsylvania and University of Michigan researchers suggest a "computational sprinting" approach to power usage. A processor could run at, for example, 16 times its sustainable rate for about half a second and then throttle back so that the processor can cool down—until the next time a surge is needed. The researchers presented the findings of their computational sprinting feasibility studies (pdf) yesterday at the 18th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture in New Orleans.

Many interactive applications on smart phones depend on short bursts of computational demand punctuated by long idle periods waiting for user input. Computational sprinting would activate otherwise powered-down processor cores (dark silicon) for subsecond bursts of intense parallel computation in response to such sporadic user activity. To handle the heat pulse from sprinting, the researchers propose encasing the processor in a phase-change material—something like candle wax—that would absorb heat by melting during the sprint, then slowly dissipate it by hardening while the device is at rest.

Most of the heat generated by mobile phones comes from the processor, as opposed to the battery, says Thomas Wenisch, a study author and an assistant professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Michigan. "All of the power drawn by the processor turns into heat," he says. "Only a fraction drawn from the battery is lost as heat within the battery due to battery inefficiency (internal resistance in the battery)."

Next up for the researchers is constructing a prototype, focusing on the thermal and material issues, says Milo Martin, another study author and an associate professor in the department of computer and information sciences at the University of Pennsylvania's School of Engineering and Applied Science. "We are also looking at additional applications, mostly in the mobile space but also in other domains, such as servers," he adds.

The researchers also plan to investigate what impact sprinting would have on application design. "This would dictate how programmers should exploit sprints and then deal with the fact that the phone might need to rest, and its impact on end-user satisfaction," Martin says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe