New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Computer Program Speeds Search for Novel Alloys

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hundreds of thousands of possible metal alloy combinations can be formed from a relatively small number of elements. As a result, finding new metal blends with desirable qualities (such as rust resistance or heat conductivity) can be an arduous task. Now a team of Danish physicists has developed a new approach to this treasure hunt that moves the search from the laboratory bench to the desktop. A report published in the current issue of Physical Review Letters describes a computer algorithm that borrows from evolutionary theory to test which compounds hold the most promise for resisting high temperatures and corrosion.

Gisli J¿hannesson and colleagues at the Technical University of Denmark cybersifted through 192,016 potential alloys, each containing up to four different metals (out of 32 possible choices), using a genetic algorithm. The researchers started with a so-called living population of alloys with various compositions. The program then created new populations of alloys in one of two ways: breeding between two parent alloys, in which elements were interchanged to form child alloys; and mutations, which replaced one element in an alloy with a randomly selected substitute. The program then selected the most stable alloys according to density functional theory (DFT), which models interactions between electrons to predict a material's properties. By manipulating the candidate metals, the team could account for practical considerations such as the prices of particular elements.

The researchers ran a number of initial populations through their evolutionary computer program and found among their survivors some of the best superalloys yet known. Their list also contained several alloys that have either not been well studied or considered at all as candidates for superalloys. The authors conclude that "the purely computational approach may therefore be able to narrow down the number of experiments needed for the development of new materials."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe