Computer Use Doesn't Cause Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Study Reveals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Long hours at the keyboard can certainly lead to a host of health problems, but carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can no longer be counted among them. Indeed, a new study from Clarke Stevens and his colleagues at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., disproves the common belief that computer use causes the condition, which produces tingling, pain, and numbness in the hands and fingers. "The findings are contrary to popular thought, but nobody has studied the problem carefully," Stevens says. "There has been very little formal study of carpal tunnel syndrome in computer users, and there is not much literature."

To fill that gap, the scientists surveyed 257 Mayo clinic employees, all of whom used computers up to seven hours a day. They then followed up with respondents who had symptoms of CTS, giving them an electromyogram (EMG), or nerve conduction study, to confirm the diagnosis. In total, they found that only 27 of the test subjects met clinical criteria for CTS; EMG tests offered additional proof in only nine participants. "There were about 30 percent of our employees surveyed who had tingling of various sorts in the hand but only 10.5 percent of them turned out to have carpal tunnel syndrome," Stevens says. "I'd like computer users to know that prolonged use of a computer does not seem to lead to carpal tunnel." That said, he adds that a majority of the study subjects suffered from neck and upper extremity pain.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe