New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Why Biologists Need More Computer Power [Video]

Mathematical modeling isn't just for physicists any more. Using mathematical equations and computer programs to simulate reality is becoming vitally important to understanding biology as well

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In an article about group immunity to influenza in the December 2014 Scientific American, Adam Kucharski of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine writes, "Models are powerful tools because they allow us to examine the effects of biological processes that could be difficult or even unethical to reproduce in real experiments. For example, we can see how infection might influence immunity in a population without having to deliberately infect people."

In this video Bonnie Berger at Massachusetts Institute of Technology explains how computers—or more accurately the people who program them—are helping to solve new problems in genetics, medicine and biological networks.

Christine Gorman is a health and science writer.

More by Christine Gorman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Why Biologists Need More Computer Power [Video]” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122014-avn2V7w91l0z32B8lI07r

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe